Pages: 1
Posted on 12-05-14, 09:56 pm (rev. 2 by Thierry on 12-05-14, 10:37 pm)
この記号は… 解読できないよ…


Karma: 6043
Posts: 1291/2725
Since: 01-17-13

I see this quite often. (wait, aren't I also counting the times I see a huge image in users' bottom sign?)

Edit: sometimes


And everytime a Admin has to come and warn the user, directly remove his header or both in some cases.



So, could any Admin put the 'No image/text but styles in the post header is allowed' (or call it however you wish) rule in the FAQ please?




Offtopic edit: My grammar is awesome, right?
Posted on 12-05-14, 09:59 pm
Giant Red Koopa


Karma: 886
Posts: 1165/1315
Since: 11-12-12
I agree, and Im pretty sure thats more than 100 pixels
Posted on 12-05-14, 10:24 pm
この記号は… 解読できないよ…


Karma: 6043
Posts: 1292/2725
Since: 01-17-13
Posted by SaturnYoshi
I agree, and Im pretty sure thats more than 100 pixels

Well, if I am right, Admins told us to put nothing at all in the header (you probaly know why), so I guess this only applies to the footer.
Posted on 12-05-14, 10:30 pm
☭ coffee and cream


Karma: 10415
Posts: 1589/2768
Since: 06-26-11
Posted by Thierry

I sees this quite often. (wait, aren't I also counting the times I sees a huge image in users' bottom sign?)

I don't see it that often.

While plaintext headers are forbidden and typically removed on sight, this is an interesting case. Gonna discuss it with staff to see what they think.
_________________________
Kuribo64 - RH-fucking-cafe - Kafuka

zrghij
Posted on 12-05-14, 10:33 pm
I am random… very random.

Karma: 750
Posts: 621/682
Since: 01-17-12
I don't mind it much really but a header that is like around 25-50px would be reasonable, I suppose.
<Silvreus>It has been 1 month, 4 days, 2 hours, 21 minutes and 3 seconds since I last remember being lazy.

Posted on 12-10-14, 08:00 pm
Micro-Goomba


Karma: -30
Posts: 17/19
Since: 11-29-14
Sorry
_________________________
My Hacks

Last updated: 05:29 PM 07/12/2014
Pages: 1